Modification of the SLAM Algorithm Based on Comparative Analysis of the Algorithm for Extracting Features From Images

2023

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/sist58284.2023.10223518
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The SLAM algorithms used on inexpensive compact boards in many standalone mobile devices are not fast enough. To solve this problem, we modified the RTAB-Map method in order to increase its speed without losing the quality of the algorithm itself. One way to improve the speed of the algorithm is to replace the SIFT keypoint extraction algorithm. In this article, we made a comparative analysis of methods for identifying local features from images.