SOME FACTS ABOUT STUDENTS’ ASSESSMENT SYSTEM//Social Sciences: Achievements and Prospects Journal 1(14), 2022 (ISSN 2733-3825)/ Chief Editor Vitalii Vl. Klevtsov /OEAPS OU - Tallinn, Estonia (Open European Academy of Public Sciences): Berlin, Germany, 30.04.2022: OEAPS OU., 2022 - P. 72-76.

2022

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.31219/osf.io/js68n
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Previously, while studying at the university, a student could theoretically not show up for classes, but come to the exam, answer questions brilliantly and leave with an excellent mark in the credit book. This is roughly what the traditional knowledge assessment system looked like, with special attention paid to the «control point» — the session. Of course, it was difficult to cope with the session without deep immersion in the subject, so for the sake of cherished marks and high-quality knowledge, we had to work during the academic half-year, answer seminars, perform laboratory and test work, but the results of the session were of primary importance. At some point, it was decided that such a system does not meet the requirements for the quality of education and does not encourage students to work systematically and daily, which means that a new approach is needed. This was the point-rating system for evaluating student performance.