Comparison of the relative merits of the midwave and longwave infrared bands for various target types using detected thermal contrast

2015

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1117/12.2194252
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The two most important atmospheric transmission bands in the infrared occur at the midwave band of 3–5 μm and the longwave band of 8–12 μm respectively. For a given infrared detector a common question asked is, of the two, which, if any, gives the better performance? A question not without controversy, in this study an analysis designed to assess the relative merits of infrared detectors operating in either of these spectral bands based on the recently defined thermal figure of merit known as the detected thermal contrast is undertaken. Under ideal limiting conditions, by considering a range of targets whose spectral emissivities vary as a function of both wavelength and temperature, we impugn a number of results previously reported in the literature regarding the performance of a detector made using detected thermal contrast as the thermal figure of merit. For the two broad types of detectors considered it is found the midwave band for both thermal and quantum detectors gives better performance for a range of different target types.