Reflexivity, reciprocality and collectivity in Jordanian Arabic

2022

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.16995/glossa.5799
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study examines, first, the syntactic asymmetries between reflexive and reciprocal constructions in Jordanian Arabic (JA), paying special attention to those with morphological marking. In particular, it will be argued that morphologically marked reflexives are one-place predicates, but their reciprocal counterparts are two-place predicates, with their internal arguments being realized either overtly or covertly in syntax. It will then be argued that what is generally regarded as a reciprocalizing morpheme (T-) indicates obligatory “collectivity,” namely, two subeventualities significantly overlapping in time (and place). An attempt will also be made to identify the semantic apparatuses which can properly capture the interpretation of a sentence when a T-marked verb appears. Finally, it will also be inquired how the T-morpheme derives the so- called Verb Forms 5, 6 and 8, and exhibits either reflexive or collective interpretations in JA. A brief cross-language and cross-dialect survey will also be attempted in Appendix B and Appendix C.