Comparative analysis of classification algorithms

2015

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/icaict.2015.7338525
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Machine learning algorithms are widely used in classification problems. Certainly, recognition quality of algorithms is important indicator, but the ability of the algorithm to learn is more significant. In this work the learning curves experiment was performed in order to identify which of the three learning rates occur when training the machine learning algorithms: overfitting, perfect case and underfitting. Neural Network, k-Nearest Neighbors and Naïve Bayes were chosen for this experiment, since their results in previous experiments were reasonable for the log data. Also this paper contains a comparative analysis of those recognition algorithms applied to the log data of Inkai uranium deposits in Kazakhstan.