Kazakh Women in ISIS: Why They Joined and Why They Returned. A Social Network Analysis Perspective

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3233/nhsdp260056
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study examines Kazakhstani women’s pathways into and out of violent extremism through systematic integration of qualitative social network analysis with feminist scholarship on gendered radicalization. Drawing on in-depth interviews with five women repatriated from ISIS territories (2019-2021), we trace network transformations across radicalization, mobilization, and reintegration phases. Findings reveal radicalization as network-mediated process characterized by systematic closure of pre-existing ties, insertion of male gatekeepers monopolizing religious education, creation of multiplex dependencies, and exploitation of gendered vulnerabilities. Three recruitment pathways emerge: male gatekeeping, family-based recruitment, and peer mobilization, with network closure speed varying from two months (orphan vulnerability) to four years (family protection present). Gender operated through network structures rather than individual psychology: mahram requirements eliminated autonomous mobility, male monopolies on religious education controlled ideological exposure, and reproductive roles created maternal dependencies. Critically, ideology emerged as post-hoc rationalization after network entrapment, not causal factor. Reintegration outcomes 5-6 years post-return reveal incomplete network reconstruction—continued state dependency, thin organic community ties, and children functioning as problematic bridges to either extremist or mainstream networks. We propose a ’network-mediated gendered exploitation’ framework emphasizing vulnerability plus network mediation equals radicalization pathway, ideology as outcome not cause, gender as network constraint, and reintegration requiring network reconstruction beyond counter-narratives. Policy implications target network-sensitive interventions: prevention through structural hole maintenance, intervention through gatekeeping disruption, and reintegration through long-term social embeddedness rather than institutional support alone.