Kazakh Women in ISIS: Why They Joined and Why They Returned. A Social Network Analysis Perspective

2026

Полный текст Открытый доступ: Hybrid Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3233/nhsdp260056
Достоверность данных 70 средняя
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

This study examines Kazakhstani women’s pathways into and out of violent extremism through systematic integration of qualitative social network analysis with feminist scholarship on gendered radicalization. Drawing on in-depth interviews with five women repatriated from ISIS territories (2019-2021), we trace network transformations across radicalization, mobilization, and reintegration phases. Findings reveal radicalization as network-mediated process characterized by systematic closure of pre-existing ties, insertion of male gatekeepers monopolizing religious education, creation of multiplex dependencies, and exploitation of gendered vulnerabilities. Three recruitment pathways emerge: male gatekeeping, family-based recruitment, and peer mobilization, with network closure speed varying from two months (orphan vulnerability) to four years (family protection present). Gender operated through network structures rather than individual psychology: mahram requirements eliminated autonomous mobility, male monopolies on religious education controlled ideological exposure, and reproductive roles created maternal dependencies. Critically, ideology emerged as post-hoc rationalization after network entrapment, not causal factor. Reintegration outcomes 5-6 years post-return reveal incomplete network reconstruction—continued state dependency, thin organic community ties, and children functioning as problematic bridges to either extremist or mainstream networks. We propose a ’network-mediated gendered exploitation’ framework emphasizing vulnerability plus network mediation equals radicalization pathway, ideology as outcome not cause, gender as network constraint, and reintegration requiring network reconstruction beyond counter-narratives. Policy implications target network-sensitive interventions: prevention through structural hole maintenance, intervention through gatekeeping disruption, and reintegration through long-term social embeddedness rather than institutional support alone.