Ester and Amide Functionalization of Maleated Polyolefins as Pour Point Depressants for Kumkol Waxy Crude Oil

Fluids, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/fluids11050124
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Pour point depressants (PPDs) based on functionalized polyolefins were obtained and evaluated for their efficiency in pour point reducing of Kumkol waxy crude oil (Kazakhstan), which contains 15.2 wt.% paraffin and has a pour point of +17 °C. An ethylene–propylene copolymer (EPR-505A) was treated through grafting of maleic anhydride (MA-g-PO) and then converted into three different derivatives that had an identical polymer backbone: an ester-functionalized, an amide-functionalized, and a combined ester–amide additive. The obtained products were tested at 500 g/t through kinematic viscosity measurements, equilibrium and kinetic interfacial tension analysis, pour point determination, cooling curve analysis, and optical microscopy. The ester derivative reduced the pour point by 7 °C, the amide derivative did so by 5 °C, and the combined additive achieved a 10 °C pour point reduction and a more than twofold decrease in kinematic viscosity at 0 °C. Interfacial tension measurements and adsorption kinetics allowed us to assume that ester groups govern macromolecular solubility and diffusion mobility, while amide groups enhance adsorption affinity at paraffin crystal surfaces. Their combined action shifts crystallization from a collective to a dispersed regime. These findings establish structure–activity relationships between polar group architecture and PPD efficiency.