Objective and subjective determinants of quality of life among university faculty

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1080/15555240.2026.2635548
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of objective medical indicators and subjective psycho-emotional factors on the well-being of university faculty members, paying particular attention to their psychological health and perceptions of their professional environment. Methodology: A mixed-methods design involving 507 faculty members from five major public universities in Kazakhstan was employed. Quantitative data were collected using standardized psycho-emotional scales, alongside objective medical indicators. Qualitative insights were obtained through semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions. Findings: Significant and consistent differences were identified across socio-demographic groups. Elevated blood pressure was more prevalent among older faculty members and those with more than 20 years of service. Female faculty members and those holding academic ranks demonstrated a higher prevalence of chronic conditions, sleep disturbances, and perceived stress (all p < 0.05). Regression and cluster analyses further indicated that perceived stress and academic workload were the strongest predictors of job satisfaction and perceptions of the institutional environment. Conclusion: The well-being of faculty members is determined by a complex interaction between stable medical indicators and persistent psycho-emotional stressors. Implications: The findings highlight the need for gender- and career-sensitive prevention, assessment, and rehabilitation strategies in higher education, with the aim of reducing burnout and improving working conditions.