Objective and subjective determinants of quality of life among university faculty

2026

Закрытый доступ Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1080/15555240.2026.2635548
Достоверность данных 70 средняя
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

Objective: To evaluate the impact of objective medical indicators and subjective psycho-emotional factors on the well-being of university faculty members, paying particular attention to their psychological health and perceptions of their professional environment. Methodology: A mixed-methods design involving 507 faculty members from five major public universities in Kazakhstan was employed. Quantitative data were collected using standardized psycho-emotional scales, alongside objective medical indicators. Qualitative insights were obtained through semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions. Findings: Significant and consistent differences were identified across socio-demographic groups. Elevated blood pressure was more prevalent among older faculty members and those with more than 20 years of service. Female faculty members and those holding academic ranks demonstrated a higher prevalence of chronic conditions, sleep disturbances, and perceived stress (all p < 0.05). Regression and cluster analyses further indicated that perceived stress and academic workload were the strongest predictors of job satisfaction and perceptions of the institutional environment. Conclusion: The well-being of faculty members is determined by a complex interaction between stable medical indicators and persistent psycho-emotional stressors. Implications: The findings highlight the need for gender- and career-sensitive prevention, assessment, and rehabilitation strategies in higher education, with the aim of reducing burnout and improving working conditions.