BETWEEN CONTROL AND DIALOGUE: SYSTEMIC COMMUNICATION DYSFUNCTION AMONG PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICERS IN KAZAKHSTAN

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.52123/1994-2370-2025-1520
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The research investigates how institutional hierarchies and administrative constraints shape the communication practices of Public Information Officers (PIOs) in Almaty local government and public institutions. The Excellence Theory guided this phenomenological study, which described the experiences of 20 PIOs using in-depth, semi-structured interviews. The findings showed that PIOs in Almaty Oblast struggle with bureaucratic approval chains, role ambiguity, and risk aversion suppress communicative initiative, while adversarial media relations and low public trust reinforce external asymmetry. Together, these forces created a context of systemic communication dysfunction, in which transparency and dialogue are structurally constrained despite official reforms under the Listening State initiative. Scientifically the study extends the Excellence Theory to a post-Soviet governance context, in which institutional asymmetry prevents communicative reforms to achieve symmetry. The practical contribution of the study draws attention to the need of structural, not rhetorical, transformation toward dialogue, autonomy, and professionalization for PIOs to be the most effective. Keywords: public information officers, local government, bureaucracy, public trust, media relations, Kazakhstan, communication challenges