Challenges to properly accounting for cyclic response in transversely isotropic elastic soil idealizations

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.21595/vp.2025.25721
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The way natural soils are deposited gravitationally inherently leads to an anisotropic microfabric. The elasticity of such anisotropic soils has typically been idealized as being transversely isotropic (or “cross anisotropic”). The importance of elastic anisotropy in geotechnical engineering applications has particularly been invoked in conjunction with predicting ground deformations associated with underground structures such as deep excavations and tunnels. The development of elastic constitutive relations for transversely isotropic geomaterials is complicated by the fact that the elastic material parameters are usually not constant. This paper briefly reviews the issue of elasticity in soils. Following a short overview of isotropic elastic idealizations, the more relevant topic of transversely isotropic idealizations is discussed, with emphasis not only on monotonic but also on cyclic response.