LSTM-Based Forecasting of Seismic Events Using Geomagnetic Indices with Balanced Training

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2025.10.190
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Earthquake forecasting remains a notorious challenge due to the complex and seemingly unpredictable nature of seismic events. Recent studies have explored potential precursors in geophysical signals such as geomagnetic indices, with mixed evidence on whether solar–terrestrial interactions influence earthquakes [1,2]. In this paper, we propose a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model to predict the occurrence of a significant earthquake within the next seven days from the global geomagnetic Dst and Kp indices. The model ingests 28-day sequences (224 time steps) with eight derived features and outputs a daily binary alert. To address class imbalance, we combine downsampling and class weighting and tune the decision threshold. Evaluated prospectively on a held-out 2023 period under the natural event prevalence, the model attains F1 = 0.94, ROC-AUC = 0.96, and Accuracy = 0.81, with an explicit precision–recall trade-of. Our findings are exploratory: we do not claim causal links, and results are reported for a single three-year global dataset. Nevertheless, the signal appears modest and potentially complementary to seismic approaches. We discuss threshold policies, possible integration into early-warning workflows, and limitations regarding physical interpretation and generalization.