Hitting the material rail: An exploration of the comparison between Alloy Steel and AISI 1020

2024

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.58712/ie.v1i1.4
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The rail track is a component that directly interfaces with the wheels. Generally, rail tracks serve as the foundation for trains, trams, and similar vehicles, bearing the friction and pressure from the wheels. Rail tracks have the potential for cracking and breaking due to various loads. Many studies have investigated the factors causing rail track fractures. This article employs the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) method using Solidworks research license software. In this simulation, two rail tracks with different materials, AISI 1020 and Alloy Steel, are numerically studied using Solidworks software to determine the most effective material for mitigating the risk of rail track fractures. The fracture risk is then calculated based on the material's fracture strength. The simulation results indicate that the fracture risk of rail tracks using Alloy Steel is lower than that of AISI 1020, thus recommending Alloy Steel as the more suitable material for rail tracks.