Analyzing Teacher Supports for Collective Argumentation in Integrative STEM Classrooms (RTP)

2024

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.18260/1-2--41277
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

AnnaMarie Conner is a professor of mathematics education at the University of Georgia.Her work research is classroombased and longitudinal, crossing boundaries between instruction in university courses and classroom teaching in school districts.She investigates teachers' beliefs and identity construction during teacher education and how teachers learn to support collective argumentation in mathematics classes.These two lines of research come together in findings describing how teachers' beliefs impact their classroom practice with respect to collective argumentation.Dr. Conner's work investigates the complex connections between teacher education, teacher characteristics, and teacher practice.She is currently collaborating with secondary mathematics teachers in supporting mathematical arguments as well as investigating how elementary teachers navigate infusing argumentation into integrative STEM instruction.