Visual history and semiotics

2023

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.31489/2023hph4/149-158
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This paper investigates the reflection of “visual turn”in semiotic research, the relationship between visual history and semiotics. The aim of the research is to investigate the relationship between visual history and semiotics and to reflect this relationship in scholarly research. The English-language works of such famous researchers and cultural theorists as Ferdinand de Saussure, Michel Foucault, Algirdas Julius Greimas, Jean Francois Lyotard, Jacques Lacan, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Jacques Derrida Jacques Derrida, Umberto Eco, Mi-chael Halliday, Charles Peirce, Noam Chomsky, and others were analyzed in this paper. History does not speak for itself, so the work of аhistorian is always interpretive. The appeal to the visual here is not a turn away from other ways, other meanings of making history. The visual is seen here as a special form of knowledge, requiring its own ways of apprehending it. This engagement with the visual will undoubtedly have a significant impact on our understanding of archives and historiography in general but does not claim to privilege the visual domain as offering a special kind of access to the past