Comparative analysis of diuretic therapy and ultrafiltration in the efficacy of acute heart failure treatment

2023

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.51582/interconf.19-20.11.2023.035
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article examines the role of furosemide and ultrafiltration in the treatment of acute heart failure. Furosemide, a loop diuretic, is successfully employed to reduce circulating blood volume and arterial pressure while increasing urea and uric acid excretion. The study compares two methods of furosemide administration: continuous infusion and intermittent injections, highlighting their advantages and limitations. Ultrafiltration, a method for removing excess fluid from the body, presents a promising alternative to diuretic therapy in the treatment of acute heart failure. This method allows for more precise fluid removal, preservation of kidney function, reduction of patient deterioration risks, improvement in their quality of life, and a decrease in diuretic dosages. Data analysis underscores the efficacy of ultrafiltration in managing acute heart failure with fluid overload and offers a perspective for future therapeutic practices.