Perceived Intelligence in Human-Robot Interaction: A Review

IEEE Access, 2024

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/access.2024.3478751
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to provide a survey on the perception of robot intelligence. After a general overview, the paper specifically focuses on how perceived intelligence varies either between before and after the experiment (“pre-test-post-test variation”), and in subsequent sessions due to habituation. After reviewing the main characteristics of autonomous agents and robots that have been shown in the literature to influence the perception of robot intelligence, papers focusing on the variation in time of perceived intelligence are analyzed in detail. Even if no unanimous conclusion was reached in the literature, evidence suggests that, in general, when a significant variation is detected, perceived intelligence tends to increase from pre-test to post-test evaluations when commercial or more recent robot platforms are used, while it tends to decrease in the case of custom-made or less recent robots. On the other hand, when a significant variation is detected, perceived intelligence seems to increase due to habituation.