Неосоветская модель медиа (часть 2)

2023

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.26577/hj.2023.v69.i3.02
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

In the previous issue of our scientific journal (Herald of KazNU, Journalism Series, No. 2 (68) 2023,pp. 16-28) the translation from English of the first part of Sarah Oates’s program article “The Neo-SovietMedia Model,” published in 2007 in the journal “Europe-Asia Studies” (Sarah Oates, 2007) was firstpresented to the readers.Also the “Foreword by the scientific editor of the translation, professor of National Research University“Higher School of Economics” in Moscow, S.G. Davydov was published. It contained deeperscientific understanding and a critical view at methodology of the research, as well as the theoretical andhistorical contexts of scientific discussions about normative media theories of the 2000s.In the current issue, readers are offered the translation of the second (final) part of Sarah Oates’sarticle, in which, according to the author’s annotation, “explores the genesis of the neo-Soviet mediamodel. Based on the results of the study of Russian media in the post-Soviet period, as well as a reviewof their activities during elections in the above region, the article concludes that Russian media currentlyoperate in a “neo-Soviet” manner. Factors shaping this media model include the rejection of a balancedapproach or objectivity; the presence of flaws in the legislation regulating the activities of the media;self-censorship; state interference and pressure on the media; lack of professionalism in the journalisticenvironment; and an atmosphere of violence against journalists. Furthermore, in the transition from theSoviet to the neo-Soviet model, there is continuity in how the media are perceived by their audience.”