Conclusion

2002

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1057/9780230502178_9
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study was undertaken to provide an analytical overview of the legal regulation of FDI in conditions of transition. However, the focus was not solely on the legal superstructure; an effort was also made to go beyond a definition of the static regulatory framework for FDI. The aim was to start the investigation at an earlier analytical point and to adopt a multidisciplinary methodological approach through which the emerging legislation regulating FDI could be explained. This concluding chapter places what has been said in context, by indicating how the study may contribute to the development of the theory of the legal regulation of FDI in transitional countries. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.