Administrative enforcement andliability

2020

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.54649/2077-9860-2020-3-8-14
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The presented article is devoted to the peculiarities of the application of the institutions of administrative responsibility and administrative coercion, associated with procedural aspects. The concept and types of effectiveness of the norms of administrative-tort law are given, problems arising in connection with the establishment and application of administrative responsibility are analyzed. The unequal position of the parties in the framework of administrative proceedings, when one of the parties is a public authority or an official endowed with powers of authority determines the introduction of the principle of an active role of the court in administrative proceedings. Maintaining a balance between the parties and ensuring equal opportunities for them should now be given more attention in the course of humanization and unification of administrative legislation.