МЕТОНИМИЯ В ЯЗЫКЕ ПОЛИТИКА

2021

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.31435/rsglobal_conf/25032021/7467
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article examines the features of the methods of metonymy as a mechanism of allegorical thinking in the language of politics. The authors give examples of metonymic synergistic models in a political context: product color, political concept; metonymic compression; name - product, name - political trend, political idea, political activity; synecdoche "part - whole", "whole - part". To carry out the linguistic analysis, material from newspapers, magazines, news sites and other sources was used. The authors come to the conclusion that cognitive metonymy in the process of implementing mental models performs, firstly, the function of concretizing abstract political ideas, social phenomena and clearly, vividly represents them, and secondly, reflects an assessment, acts as a means of political assessment and implements an axiological function, thirdly, it serves as a means of a language game, contributing to the emotionality and effectiveness of a political text.