On the Effect of Log-Mel Spectrogram Parameter Tuning for Deep Learning-Based Speech Emotion Recognition

Azamat Mukhamediya, Siamac Fazli, Amin Zollanvari

IEEE Access, 2023

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/access.2023.3287093
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Speech emotion recognition (SER) has become a major area of investigation in human-computer interaction. Conventionally, SER is formulated as a classification problem that follows a common methodology: (i) extracting features from speech signals; and (ii) constructing an emotion classifier using extracted features. With the advent of deep learning, however, the former stage is integrated into the latter. That is to say, deep neural networks (DNNs), which are trained using log-Mel spectrograms (LMS) of audio waveforms, extract discriminative features from LMS. A critical issue, and one that is often overlooked, is that this procedure is done without relating the choice of LMS parameters to the performance of the trained DNN classifiers. It is commonplace in SER studies that practitioners assume some “usual” values for these parameters and devote major efforts to training and comparing various DNN architectures. In contrast with this common approach, in this work we choose a single lightweight pre-trained architecture, namely, SqueezeNet, and shift our main effort into tuning LMS parameters. Our empirical results using three publicly available SER datasets show that: (i) parameters of LMS can considerably affect the performance of DNNs; and (ii) by tuning LMS parameters, highly competitive classification performance can be achieved. In particular, treating LMS parameters as hyperparameters and tuning them led to ~23%, ~10%, and ~11% improvement in contrast with the use of “usual” values of LMS parameters in EmoDB, IEMOCAP, and SAVEE datasets, respectively.