Business strategy, sustainability, and firm value: A test of financial slack and agency theories

2023

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1002/mde.3855
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Abstract Do cost leaders engage with sustainability practices or avoid them to save costs, and do differentiators implement those practices to attract the sympathy of the customers or not? How do shareholders of each strategy follower consider those practices? Answering these questions is the main purpose of this study. We find that while cost leadership is significantly and positively associated with environmental, social, and governance sustainability, differentiation is significantly and negatively associated with social and environmental sustainability but not with governance sustainability. While cost leaders' shareholders approve of social and governance sustainability, differentiators' shareholders disapprove of environmental, social, and governance sustainability.