Табиғи ресурстардың саяси экономикасы. Тұжырымдамалар, модельдер, институттар бойынша академиялық пікірсайыс

2019

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.26577/jpcp.2019.v70.i4.08
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Abstract. This paper analyses the political economy of natural resources literature classifying it on the economic, political, and social aspects regarding institutional interplay. Natural resources might lead to economic prosperity and political development or they destabilize macroeconomic system with windfalls and create political rivalry and social unrest. The specific type of resources matters and makes adifference as well; is it oil or coffee or timber? Institutional development and strategic choices make differencesand final outcomes as they determine policies and choices by individual actors. Definitely there are country specific contexts in terms of political culture, demography, historical past and general path dependence but current consensus among researchers is that institutions matter the most. In our paper we look to the different approaches to analyze natural resources in their political and economic parts,and first of all to oil, we look at Dutch disease as a special case of that political and economic interplay.Key words: Kazakhstan, natural resources, political economy, post-Soviet, oil and gas.