Comparing official and literary discourses оn sino-soviet border crossings of 1962

2019

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.26577/jh-2019-4-h6
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Оfficial discourse (soviet and Chinese) interpreted the reasons of ethnic groups exodusetatist – border defense, L control over population migrations, economic losses and maintenance ofbilateral relations at certain level. Q.Zhumadilov drew the line of affirmation of Kazakhs migration fromChina as salvation, but essential ethno-demographic resource for maintenance of ethnic potential ofKazakhs in soviet Kazakhstan. The official soviet discourse being diplomatic in form, especially, when itconcerned the regulating technicalities with the Chinese officials, was civic in nature. The Soviet Unioninterpreted the right to patronize the former Russian/ soviet citizens residing in China through the missionor responsibility to protect. Although the main motivation was to gain as many loyal to the sovietregime human force for realization of state building projects within the USSR. The Chinese discoursewas mainly political administrative in form, and legal in nature, as it referred to the right to supervise thepopulation of the province and prevent intervention of alien forces into it domestic sphere