Russian Turkestan In 1870s: USA Diplomat Notes

2019

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.26577/jh-2019-3-h12
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The rapid conquest of Central Asia realized by the Russian empire during 1860s is still a case to raise and discuss some acute questions. As A. Morrison (Morrison 2014) rightly noted the main explanations are divided between «Great Game» security concept (Carrere d’Encausse, Pierce, Bennigsen 1969; Morrison 2008) and «Cotton Canard» approach mainly represented in works of Soviet historians (Khalfin 1960; Khalfin 1965; Kastel’skya 1980). However, historians pay little attention towards the reaction of the other countries concerning Russian presence in Central Asia. The aim of the paper was using archival documents from Britain’s Foreign Office (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Great Britain) to enlarge the scope of the Russian colonization in 1870s. This article is based on the report of Mr. Eugene Schyler, Secretary of the United States Legation in St. Petersburg after his trip to Russian Turkestan made in 1874. He exposed some weak points in administrative system while as he insisted the Russians «counterpoised» British moves in the region.