THE PRACTICES OF RUSSIANS’ REGIONAL IDENTITY CONSTRUCTION IN MEDIA DISCOURSE

2019

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.33739/2587-5434-2019-2-2-71-76
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

gumanitarnyh nauk (3), 248.Bashirova N.Z.(2011).Tipologiya intertekstov v presse [Typology of intertexts in the press].Uchenyye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta.Gumanitarnyye nauki (153), 191-203.Vodennikov D. B. https://www.gazeta.ru/comments/column/vodennikov/[24.04.2019].Dobrosklonskaya T.G. (2006).Mediadiskurs kak