Research of the Algorithm for the Work on Scientific Texts

2015

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.5539/mas.v9n4p354
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article focuses on teaching professional communication to non-philology students. The purpose of the article is to demonstrate an example of a particular text consistency and coherence stages at working with texts on their profession. A system of consistent actions is offered when working on scientific text (nine-step algorithm). This algorithm allows the student to not only learn how to understand and analyse scientific text on their profession, but also prepare them for self-production of the text. Eventually, it will prepare the student to creation of qualified scientific works on the topic of the research.