The Role of Government and Private Institutions in Credit Cycles in the U.S. Mortgage Market

2020

Full text Open access: Green Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3386/w27499
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

We show that the distribution of combined loan-to-value ratios (CLTVs) for purchase mortgages in the U.S. has been remarkably stable over the last 25 years.But there was a dramatic shift during the housing boom of the 2000s in the provision of high-CLTV loans through private sources, which replaced almost one-for-one the share of high-CLTV loans directly guaranteed by the government, via FHA and VA.Post 2008, FHA/VA loans increased back to 30% of all purchase mortgages.This substitution between government and privately backed high-CLTV loans holds within ZIP codes, properties and borrower types over the full sample period.We also show that the increase in private high-CLTV lending follows local house price increases rather than preceding them.These findings suggest that the housing boom was not accompanied by a shift towards more high-CLTV loans, and instead favor models that rely on changes in collateral values or broad changes in house price expectations.