Conclusion

2020

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.4324/9780429439940-20
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This conclusion presents some closing thoughts on the key concepts discussed in the preceding chapters of this book. The book illustrates the numerous policy challenges and opportunities facing Asia’s cities, as expressed through a variety of contexts, policy domains, and normative perspectives. It presents an argument about the potential ability of public policy to manage complexity and disruption. The book considers the logic of knowledge creation and the missed opportunities to precipitate a paradigm shift in the epistemic foundations of public policy itself. Understanding how external pressures visit disruption and contradiction on policy systems begins by accounting for path dependencies in the evolution of urban governance. Two related phenomena –globalization and neoliberalism – have precipitated this disruption and contradiction. Issues concerning the scale of governance – including the well-embraced idea that “all politics is local” –underscore the potential of cities to rectify governance failings.