Study on Tensegrity Structure Stability and Payload Manipulability: Triangular vs. Quadrangular Designs

2025

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/arso64737.2025.11125001
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Over the past few decades, tensegrity structures have garnered significant interest among robotics researchers due to their high payload capacity, lightweight construction, and resistance to external shocks. Despite these advantages, certain aspects, such as the impact of the number of wires and rods on the robot’s stiffness, remain underexplored. This study aims to fill this gap through experimental analysis, focusing on the robustness of tensegrity structures against external forces influenced by the number of wires and struts. We present an experimental comparison of operational consistency under various conditions, including payload, no payload, and vibration tests, between two prototypes: one with a triangular prismatic shape and another with a quadrangular shape featuring a larger number of tensegrity elements. The primary objective of this research is to evaluate the structural stability and payload capacity of both prototypes based on the number of wires and bars.