Comparative Analysis of Administrative Liability for Driving While Intoxicated in the Commonwealth of Independent States

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.31297/hkju.24.4.5
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to reveal the specifics of administrative legislation of Kazakhstan and other Commonwealth of Independent States countries. The authors employed various methods of scientific research, namely analysis, synthesis, comparison, deduction, abstraction, and the formal- legal method, and defined the dominant role of fully functioning administrative liability in the country’s legal environment. In addition, they investigated administrative sanctions as one of the legal norms applied to a person who is driving while intoxicated. Distinctive features of the legal acts of the above countries were singled out, and the corpus delicti of this administrative offence, possible sanctions, and qualifying characteristics examined. This helped to identify the main approaches among CIS lawmakers to the rules of administrative law. The authors also noted the advantages of Kazakhstan’s code of administrative offences, in particular a large number of qualifying characteristics.