Optimizing scaffold pore size for tissue engineering: insights across various tissue types

Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2024

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1444986
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

microenvironment, directly influencing cellular interactions, migration, nutrient transfer, vascularization, and the formation of functional tissues. For optimal tissue formation, scaffold design must account for various parameters, including material composition, morphology, mechanical properties, and cellular compatibility. This review highlights the importance of interconnected porosity and pore size, emphasizing their impact on cellular behavior and tissue formation across several tissue engineering domains, such as skin, bone, cardiovascular, and lung tissues. Specific pore size ranges enhance scaffold functionality for different tissues: small pores (∼1-2 µm) aid epidermal cell attachment in skin regeneration, moderate pores (∼2-12 µm) support dermal migration, and larger pores (∼40-100 µm) facilitate vascular structures. For bone tissue engineering, multi-layered scaffolds with smaller pores (50-100 µm) foster cell attachment, while larger pores (200-400 µm) enhance nutrient diffusion and angiogenesis. Cardiovascular and lung tissues benefit from moderate pore sizes (∼25-60 µm) to balance cell integration and nutrient diffusion. By addressing critical design challenges and optimizing pore size distributions, this review provides insights into scaffold innovations, ultimately advancing tissue regeneration strategies.