Abstract
Main conceptual positions and methodological paradigms to problem imperial traditions and symbolsof the nomadic society are considered in the article.The study of concrete historical events and processesassociated with nomadic structures provides the ground for the formulation and analysis of conceptual,methodological problems.Reconstruction of the political-administrative and system-structuralmodel of the Mongolian empire promotes a deepening of understanding of general trends and directionsin studying the modern movement of historical knowledge in the issues of interconnection and interactionof the political and social system of nomadic societies. Modern historical science aims to conducta systematic analysis of the Mongolian society proper, its social structure and social organization, theidentification of the basic and significant prerequisites for the formation of the empire, the nature of itssocio-political and administrative-managerial position.Mobility, the dynamism of political processes innomadic societies led to instability and mobility of the whole structure, and cardinal changes led to thetransformation of the whole system as a whole.