COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ENFORCEMENT OF CONTRACTS IN LITHUANIA AND KAZAKHSTAN

Indira Sovetovna SAKTAGANOVA, Sholpan Ormanova, Elnara Ashimova, Maira Zhumanova

2019

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)

DOI 10.18510/hssr.2019.7385

Data confidence 70 medium

How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Purpose of Study: The aim of the study is to investigate the comparative analysis of the enforcement of contracts in Lithuania and Kazakhstan. Methodology: Comparative qualitative research methods. Results: The enforcement by arbitration or mediation is not permitted in Kazakhstan. Even now, Kazakhstan fails to rely on the institutions of arbitration or mediation and neither their awards are enforceable by the civil courts. Implications/Applications: Enforcement of contracts is still developing in Kazakhstan while it has been developed and fully adopted as per international standards in Lithuania.