Commissioner-Provider Relations: International Experience and Implications for China’s Policy

2018

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1596/978-1-4648-1075-6_ch6
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Examines “commissioner-provider” relations in the provision and delivery of aged care services, drawing on experiences from Europe where most countries have moved away from public provision of long-term care services to engaging private sector providers for market-based solutions—guided by the so-called New Public Management framework—discussing the implications of these international experiences for China, where policymakers have come to realize the government needs to shift its role from a direct supplier and provider of aged care services to a purchaser and regulator of services provided increasingly by the private sector. Given the rising number of people in need, China’s long-term care sector faces great challenges requiring joint efforts and cooperation among the national government, local authorities, providers, and families. The design of a comprehensive national long-term care system will help improve conditions for a large number of impaired elderly, ensure access for the less affluent, and keep costs at an acceptable level.