Evaluating direct and indirect evidence of climatic change by Hölder regularity and order pattern in time series

2013

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1134/s0016793213080148
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The several competing reconstructions of Northern Hemisphere temperature variability exists with partly conflicting evidence. Here we considered a specific problem of choosing “the best” reconstruction, in a frame of assumptions, that they are produced by smooth dynamical system as well as instrumental time series. Using some sophisticated measures of similarity, we could not match to all existing hemispheric paleoclimate reconstructions with hypothesis about any deterministic system which can produced its as typical projection of their trajectories. The results cast doubt on the conventional techniques frequently used to reconstruct past climate variability.