Two decades of research on Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis: a bibliometric mapping and research agenda

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1080/14780887.2026.2703494
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study provides a bibliometric overview of research informed by Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis from 2006 to 2025. Using 1,728 Web of Science Core Collection publications, it examines publication and citation trends and the intellectual foundations of thematic analysis. VOSviewer and Bibliometrix identify influential authors, institutions, journals, countries, and keyword networks. Findings show rapid growth in the use of thematic analysis, especially in the past decade, and a shift from procedural applications to interpretive, reflexive approaches associated with Big Q qualitative research. The H-classics corpus confirms Braun and Clarke’s work as the field’s central foundation while revealing tensions between descriptive and reflexive orientations. Four keyword clusters span health care, psychosocial research, developmental contexts, and global challenges. The study highlights the importance of epistemological transparency and reflexivity for strengthening methodological coherence and advancing qualitative inquiry across disciplines.