From Measurements to Patients: Data Aggregation in Supervised Classification of X-Ray Diffraction Datasets

International Journal of Translational Medicine, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/ijtm6020022
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Machine learning approaches are widely used in modern medical diagnostics, including cancer detection. The results can be significantly improved by aggregating individual measurements, and appropriate aggregation methods should be established. Methods: We applied various measurement aggregation strategies both before and after machine learning modeling to two datasets of X-ray diffraction images: human breast biopsy samples and canine claw samples. Two classifiers, Random Forest and Logistic Regression, were used to determine classification metrics: the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) and balanced accuracy. Results: We found that all aggregation types improve classification metrics, with aggregation after modeling yielding better performance. Depending on the dataset and approach, either classifier can produce better results. For human breast samples, Random Forest with the logit aggregation strategy provides an ROC-AUC exceeding 0.9. For the canine dataset, both Random Forest with the logit aggregation strategy and Logistic Regression with the median of cancer probabilities achieve an ROC-AUC of about 0.85. Conclusions: We examined several simple, straightforward aggregation methods for patient diagnosis based on multiple measurements per patient and achieved significant improvements in classification metrics.