Methods of assessing and improving comprehensive preparedness of junior rowers (U19) during the winter competitive period

Health sport rehabilitation, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.58962/hsr.1315
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Background and purpose Comprehensive preparedness, which combines physical, technical, tactical, theoretical, and psychological components, is a key determinant of performance in rowing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of assessment methods and to verify the impact of the experimental program we developed to enhance the integrated preparedness of junior rowers (U19) during the winter competitive period. Material and Methods Thirty U19 rowers (≥ third category) participated from January to March 2025. A single-group pre–post design was applied: all athletes underwent testing before and after a 4-week experimental program. Assessments included 2000 m ergometer testing (physical), expert video analysis (technical), theoretical and tactical tests (10 questions each), and the Spielberger–Khanin anxiety inventory (psychological). Statistical analysis (Excel VBA) comprised descriptive statistics (including skewness and kurtosis), Pearson correlation, paired t-tests and Cohen’s d (p < 0,05). Results Significant improvements were recorded in physical (+55,8%), technical (+22,7%), theoretical (+16,5%), and tactical (+16,7%) preparedness, with reductions in situational (–20,1%) and trait anxiety (–11,2%). All changes were statistically significant (p < 0,05). Conclusions The results confirm the effectiveness of the proposed assessment methods and the experimental program designed in this study for improving the comprehensive preparedness of junior rowers (U19) during the winter competitive period.