Investigation of the Machining Parameters and the Environment of Polyamide 6 on Surface Roughness Using Experimental and Statistical Methods

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.48084/etasr.13208
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study investigates experimentally and statistically the influences of the Machining Parameters (MPs) and environments on the surface roughness (Ra) of Polyamide 6 (PA6) during the turning operation. The experiments were conducted using a lathe machine, carbide cutting tool, and roughness tester. The statistical approach was implemented using Taguchi Experiment Design (TED) and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). The parameters and their values were: cutting velocity (VC) of 125, 200, and 250 m/min; feed rate (FR) of 0.05, 0.1, and 0.15 mm/rev; and cutting depth (DC) of 2, 4, and 6 mm. The environments used were: dry (D), compressed air (A), and air-water mixture (A+W). The research aimed to improve the cutting surface quality of PA6 based on the R criterion. The results revealed that the FR is the most influential factor on R compared to other factors. The effect percentages on R were 61%, 15%, 13%, and 11% for FR, Machining Environments (MEs), DC, and VC, respectively. The optimum combination has been achieved based on an FR of 0.05 mm/rev, air with water, a DC of 2 mm, and a VC of 125 m/min, providing a minimum total average surface roughness (Ra) of 1.2 μm for PA6. The study demonstrates that an optimum combination can enhance the cutting surface quality, reduce the machining costs, and provide a pathway for producing high-performance PA6 components.