Development of a practitioner training model: a metacognitive approach based on the Denver II developmental screening test

Frontiers in Education, 2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3389/feduc.2025.1654562
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Introduction This study introduces a training model developed to support practitioners in effectively using the Denver II Developmental Screening Test. The model was shaped through a five-step process and is grounded in metacognitive principles. It aims to help practitioners not only follow steps but also pause, anticipate challenges, and consider their actions—practices often neglected in typical training. Methods The model development process involved qualitative data collection with fifteen early childhood professionals who engaged with the model during its implementation. Their feedback and observed behaviors were qualitatively examined. Additionally, insights were obtained from several field experts who reviewed the model. Results Findings indicated that the model was perceived as flexible and relevant across diverse practice settings. Experts highlighted its applicability in improving practitioners’ ability to reflect, self-monitor, and adapt their professional judgment during the use of developmental screening tools. Discussion The model’s contribution lies in shifting the focus from simply following procedures to fostering practitioners’ cognitive and metacognitive engagement in decision-making. While developed around the Denver II framework, the approach shows potential to inform practices in related assessment contexts.