Deep learning based time-dependent reliability analysis of an underactuated lower-limb robot exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation

2025

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1177/09544119251349362
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study evaluates the reliability of an underactuated wearable lower-limb exoskeleton designed to assist with gait rehabilitation. Recognizing the complexity of system reliability, a deep learning framework augmented with Long short-term Memory (LSTM) was utilized for the time-dependent reliability analysis of dynamic systems. The research commenced with the development of a lower-limb gait robot, modeled on a Stephenson III six-bar linkage mechanism. Following the mechanical design, computer-aided design (CAD) tools were employed to conceptualize a lower-limb robotic exoskeleton for rehabilitation purposes. The design incorporated two metallic materials (aluminum and steel), and a composite material (carbon fiber) tested using SolidWorks ® . The prototype achieved a lightweight design (~1.63 kg) for carbon fiber material. An LSTM-enhanced deep neural network algorithm was implemented to predict the time-dependent reliability of joint displacements and end-effector trajectories. Finally, conditional probability methods were applied to complete the time-dependent system reliability assessment. The designed mechanical system for gait rehabilitation demonstrated high reliability ( R ≈ 0.87). Over 200 simulation runs, reliability trends showed consistent and robust predictions.