Meta-analysis of mobile applications and their impact on student outcomes: Enhancing interest and intellectual abilities in physics learning

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.29333/ejmste/16653
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This meta-analysis study examines the impact of mobile applications on students’ affective outcomes in physics learning, evaluating their contribution to the development of interest and cognitive abilities. The study reviews experimental research from the Web of Science and Scopus databases, considering only controlled experimental studies. A key inclusion criterion was that the selected studies reported sample size, arithmetic mean, standard deviation, or statistical values such as t, F, and df. The latest inclusion period covers February 2025. For data analysis, a statistical package program for meta-analysis was used, and the random effects model was applied. To detect publication bias, funnel plot and “trim and fill” method test were utilized. Educational levels, publication year, main intellectual outcome, mobile learning technique, publication type, database, and cultural variables were tested as moderators. As a result, mobile applications were found to be widely effective in enhancing student interest and intellectual abilities in physics education. All hypotheses were confirmed regarding the tested moderator variables such as education level, publication year, technique, intellectual output, type of research and database and culture. In this context, recommendations were provided for researchers and practitioners.