Optimization of dual duct forced auxiliary ventilation system to mitigate particulate matter emissions in a polymetallic underground mine environment: A hybrid approach

PLoS ONE, 2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0322278
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The auxiliary ventilation system (AVS) is essential for managing airflow and reducing particulate matter (PM) levels in underground mine environments. Despite its importance, prior studies have insufficiently examined the optimal design of dual duct forced (DDF) AVS to improve airflow and PM management during the loading and unloading operations of diesel-powered equipment (DPE). This work addresses the research gap by utilizing a hybrid methodology to assess the effectiveness of four DDF-AVS designs (1-4) under two distinct DPE operating scenarios: (S1) DPE loading beside the working face and (S2) DPE unloading at a temporary dumpsite. The study utilized Ansys-Fluent for numerical simulations and revealed the following conclusions: the airflow field within the drift displays intricate patterns that substantially affect PM transport; S2 presents the greatest potential PM exposure danger to DPE operators, succeeded by S1. Among the designs, AVS 2 and AVS 3 exhibited efficiency by less complicated airflow patterns and optimal PM transposition within the drift. In comparison to AVS 1, the PM dispersion enhanced by 15.66% and 7.83% in S1, whereas in S2, it improved by 27% and 46% under AVS 2 and AVS 3, respectively. This research study offers significant insights for optimizing AVS designs, minimizing PM exposure to miners, and improving the underground mine environment through cleaner production techniques.