The comparison of methods for assessing the productivity of scientific subjects

2021

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/csit52700.2021.9648804
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article considers the known methods of assessing the productivity of scientific subjects. The quantitative estimation of productivity of issues of scientific activity is offered. Methods for the sensitivity of changes in estimates from the number of publications of the authors are studied. It is established that the proposed method has a higher sensitivity than other known ones. The study also covers the issue of visualization of the citation network of scientists.