Experience of using SMART technologies in university education

2021

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/icecco53203.2021.9663820
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article summarizes the experience of using SMART technologies in the educational process of the university. The concept and the main components of SMART technologies (forms, methods, hardware and software) are identified. Specific examples of the use of SMART technologies (mobile learning, Interactive Whiteboard, Prezi and Kahoot! Web services) are considered to support face-to-face classes, improve the efficiency of students’ independent work, and systematically monitor knowledge and skills. The intellectual software used in the university to support active forms and methods of teaching (didactic games, discussions and project method) is presented.