Using Geoinformation Technologies for Evaluation and Resilience Forecast of Open Pit Walls

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.28991/hef-2025-06-03-06
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study presents an analysis of open-pit bench stability based on laboratory strength testing of limestone and kinematic analysis of rock mass fracturing. The Hoek-Brown criterion was applied to determine the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of intact rock samples and the internal friction angle using RocData_v5. The UCS was measured at 82 MPa, with additional consideration given to the D factor, which accounts for blast-induced rock mass damage. Stability analysis was conducted using Dips and SWedge software, revealing that planar sliding and wedge failures dominate on the northeastern slope. The results indicate that 35% of fracture intersections fall within the critical wedge failure zone, and the actual bench stability is below the internationally accepted threshold (25–50%). To mitigate these risks, it is recommended to adjust the pit slope orientation to an azimuth of 325–310°, revise the Stage 2 pit design by reducing the bench angle to 60°, avoid bench strike directions between 330–360°, employ controlled blasting techniques, or increase berm width to 12 meters.