Monitoring the Development of University Scientific Schools in University Knowledge Management

2015

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.5220/0005464202220230
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This paper proposes a technological approach to university scientific knowledge management which integrates the ontology based knowledge model and the methods of university scientific resource intellectual processing. The process-oriented On-To-Knowledge methodology is used as the basis for university scientific knowledge management. Some models and methods of university scientific knowledge management have been studied. The developed model of a specialist that reflects the level of scientific activity productivity and overall assessment of the employee's scientific activity has been described. A specialist’s competence in knowledge areas is based on the processing of information resources. The approach to the university scientific school identification based on the clustering of university academic community common interests has been described.